Letters
to the Editor
To the Editor:
Fire
protection, police, public safety personnel, and our
local public school systems would be devastated if
the Palesky Tax Cap (Question 1) passes in November.
If it passes, all municipal services will be negatively
impacted, including those that help and protect children.
It is flawed with serious constitutional problems
and will certainly cause an increase in state taxes
to make up for the $687 million shortfall that Maine
towns would face (U. of Maine study). There is no
doubt our tax system needs reform to address high
property taxes, but Palesky's plan takes a sledgehammer
approach and goes way too far. Please join us in voting
NO on November 2.
Gray-New
Gloucester Teachers Association
To
the Editor:
As
most of us know, Maine has one of the worst records
in the country regarding our business climate and
tax burden. Unfortunately, recent legislatures have
chosen to ignore this situation, and in fact have
continued to exacerbate the problem.
However, all is not lost. We, the voters of this state,
have the power to undo the damage. Our state's constitution
gives us the right to do ourselves, that which our
legislature has been unable or unwilling to do, and
in this case bring government spending and taxes back
under control. At the polls next month, volunteers
will be gathering signatures for a Taxpayer Bill of
Rights or "TABOR" referendum.
TABOR allows reasonable government growth at all levels
from State to local, including school districts, by
managing or controlling such growth.
It is based on Colorado's "TABOR," but modified
to be compatible with Maine and to provide budget
stability.
It allows spending to increase no more that the rate
of inflation plus population growth, thus eliminating
wanton spending of surplus revenues.
It does allow for any necessary increases above this
limit with approval of 2/3 of the governing body and
by the voters.
In years where revenues exceed expenditures, it commits
80% of surpluses to a taxpayer relief fund for return
to the taxpayers, and the remaining 20% to a dedicated
budget stabilization fund to ensure fiscal stability.
It repeals indexing of the gas tax, ending the recently
implemented automatic increases and unaccountability
for these increases.
If you would like to learn more about this proposal,
or would like to volunteer in the effort to gather
signatures, please go to the web site: www.taxpayerbillofrights.com,
or locally you may contact me at 657-4754 or gfoster@securespeed.net.
Gary
Foster, Gray
Dear
Editor:
First
let me congratulate Rep. Austin for a perfect attendance
record on roll call votes. It is not done often by
Legislators.
Mr. [Gary] Foster claims a concept Rep Austin supports
(constitutional amendment to limit spending) was not
allowed to come to the floor [Letters to the Editor,
10-7-04]. Let it be clear that ALL BILLS submitted
must be sent from Committee to the floor for action
before the Legislature adjourns. The spring concept
made for good Republican rhetoric and campaign fodder
but no record of action. Will Rep. Austin be presenting
such a bill if she is re-elected?
Mr. Foster praises Rep. Austin for being one of a
few that voted against the State Budget. The question
is why? Are you aware that 42% of the State Budget
is returned to municipalities and counties. (documentation
was attached to this letter). Had Rep. Austin's position
prevailed, what property tax crisis would be faced
with? Isn't Question #1 enough of a burden without
supporting 42% less from the State?
I would ask Rep. Austin (and Mr. Foster, if he would
like to) to give us her (and his) recommended spending
cuts - before November 2nd. If you call for less State
spending, then you - as an elected official - owe
it to your constituents to outline where those cuts
will be made before they cast a vote.
Respectfully,
Donnie Carroll, Gray
To
the Editor:
The town council voted to put a counter to the Tax
Cap issue regarding the town of Gray's debt on the
ballot last week. Although I am all for voting on
taxes and debt for our town, I'm concerned about the
process for putting additions to the ballot within
the period that absentee voters can send in their
ballots. I am not in favor of the question being added
so late.
The town attorney advised the town that it was OK!?
What about the voters' rights, the precedent this
sets for future town councils, and future controversial
questions at the last minute? Maybe it's time to find
a new town attorney.
Skip
Crane, Gray
To
the Editor:
I
am writing to ask for your support in voting to return
Karl Turner to the State Senate. Over the past 4 years
Karl has been very responsive to the citizens of Gray.
He has participated in several of our meetings and
forums, from the turnpike to taxes, as well as other
public events. Karl is hard working and knows the
issues and people of Gray. From my political discussion
at work I know that Karl is a highly respected team
player with his Republican and Democratic colleagues.
Karl is the lead Republican on the Appropriations
Committee. At a time when the battle for Tax Reform
is great, whether the Tax Cap passes or not, we need
to be represented by a Senator who understands economics
and the state's budget. Karl has consistently voted
to improve the economy and jobs in Maine. The Maine
Economic Research Institute (MERI), a nonprofit, nonpartisan,
research organization that tacks legislation to improve
Maine'seconomy, scores Karl a 93 out of 100.
Karl has been a hard working senator representing
the citizens of Gray. His 30 years of business experience
and his experience in the legislature will be very
important for a fair and equitable economic recovery.
He is well respected and can get the job done. Please
join me in voting for Karl Turner for State Senate.
Bill
Getz, Gray
To
the Editor:
As
I campaign door to door in New Gloucester I am often
asked what I think about the upcoming vote on the
Tax Cap so I thought I would share my beliefs here.
As a member of the Durham budget committee for the
past four years, I have been proud of how we have
made prudent financial decisions - and how, like in
New Gloucester, each line item comes for a vote at
a town meeting. On the local level, we decide where
we want to spend or save money - we decide what makes
good sense and what serves our community. For example,
when we had the opportunity to contribute matching
funds to a Homeland security grant to purchase a fire
truck we were able to do it - with great savings to
the town.
I believe in that kind of local control - the kind
of control that would not be possible under the Tax
Cap.
Second, although I feel disappointed that neither
the Republicans nor the Democrats could agree on a
tax relief package, I am more concerned that the tax
cap will have long term and unintended consequences
that will eliminate essential services we count on.
This is not thoughtful tax reform - it is a meat cleaver
that will decimate our towns and schools.
Finally, as a member of the State Chamber of Commerce
I would like to suggest that some consideration be
given to our tax relief plan. It is progressive so
those who can afford it will pay more, it maintains
local control, and it will cap the growth of government
spending.
It is a product of a thoughtful process that involved
ideas and opinions of hundreds of businesses and individuals.
To find out more about the Maine State Chamber of
Commerce's plan you can go to
http://www.mainechamber.org/news1.asp.
Geoffrey
Leighton
Durham, 207-353-7151
Dear
Editor,
I
wish to add my voice of support for the reelection
of Michael Vaughan, Republican, State Representative
District 105 New Gloucester and Durham. Michael has
previously represented Durham and part of Brunswick.
While in Augusta, Michael has distinguished himself
as a thoughtful and intelligent representative. He
understands the delicate balance between appropriate
government regulation and a workable business climate.
Some folks take exception to Vaughn's unwillingness
to rubber stamp all environmental proposals.
Vaughn bases his decisions, environmental or otherwise,
on thorough research and complete information of both
sides. If Michael votes "no" on a bill,
it will have failed to meet the following common sense
principals: 1. Is it based on junk science? 2. does
it pass the straight face test? 3. Does it kill jobs?
4.What does it cost the taxpayer in real dollars?
After 30 years of Democrat political dominance Maine
now has the second highest tax burden in the US, the
second highest health insurance costs in the US and
the 48th least friendly business climate.
Republican, Mike Vaughn: has earned a 100% National
Federation of Independent business rating, Honors
the Tax Payers Protection Pledge, Member of the DHS
reform group, MADAR, Supporter of legislative oversight
group O.P.E.G.A, serves on the Financial and Insurance
Committee, has a A rating from the NRA, is a past
BIW shipyard worker, and is endorsed by Senator Susan
Collins.
On November 2, please consider Mike Vaughn to serve
as our next Representative.
Thank
you,
Ed Mitchell, New Gloucester
To
the Editor,
I am writing in support of Sue Austin's re-election
to the Maine House representing Gray and parts of
North Yarmouth and Pownal.
Sue was born, raised, and educated in Maine. Her roots
go deep into the fabric of this state. She has served
the interests of The Opportunity Farm, spent many
years on the SAD #15 Board and recently served on
Gray's Town Council. These are but three of her many
efforts to serve our citizenry. No one better understands
the needs and wants of the broader community than
Sue Austin.
Sue Austin's personal style is to listen carefully,
ask questions, gather facts and then form conclusions.
It has served her well in the local community and
as a State Representative. It is a style that has
made her very effective in Augusta. She is very qualified
to serve the voters of House District # 109 well in
the 122nd Maine Legislature.
Please vote for Sue Austin for the Maine House on
November 2nd.
Sen. Karl W. Turner
Cumberland