News
Gray
contingent appeals to Attorney General
By Elizabeth Prata
Augusta--SAD representatives accompanied the Town
of Gray representatives on Thursday, November 4 to
Assistant Attorney General's office to appeal for
the uncomplicated transfer of the Pennell Institute,
lands, and Pennell Educational Trust to the Town of
Gray.
New documents uncovered by two citizens last month
and reviewed by the Gray Town Attorney substantially
affected the parties' positions regarding who owns
Pennell Institute.
Pennell is a 19th century brick building in the center
of Gray that was specifically constructed to become
the town's educational institution. It served in that
capacity from the late 1880s until the early-1960s,
when the School Administrative District was formed
and the SAD took over ownership. Now that the SAD
no longer needs to use the building, which was expanded
fifty years ago, school officials want to offer the
building back to the Town.
Even the term 'ownership' has caused squabbling, because
there is a Trust that governs how the building is
to be used. The SAD maintains that the Trustees own
the building, the SAD technically does not own it,
the SAD Board as Trustees do.
Once a School Department no longer needs a building,
it must follow certain Maine statutory conditions
in the disposal process, outlined in Title 20-A, "Chapter
202: Closing And Disposition of Public Elementary
And Secondary School Buildings, §4103. Disposal
or other use of real property closed for school purposes."
However, the existence of this trust trumps the statutory
disposal process in Pennell's case. There has been
eighteen months of discussion, negotiation, and lawsuits
lodged with the Attorney General as officials try
to untangle the enmeshed two-hundred year old history
that surrounds the building and issues regarding its
ownership, use, and disposal process.
In 1953, Private and Special Legislation was created
for the special purpose of making the Gray School
District in anticipation of its issuance of bonds
to expand the high school (Pennell). A resulting 1954
Superior Court order properly noticed and extinguished
the remainder interests of the Pennell heirs and unencumbered
the building and lands associated from the trust.
There is a 1954 deed that supports this transference.
The "upshot," Attorney William Dale wrote,
"is that the original Pennell land and building
have not been encumbered by the trust restrictions
since 1954 and are instead subject to the school closing
statute, 20-A section 4101-4104...This reasoning probably
applies to the other lands as well, after all, they
were to be subject to the same restrictions as Mr.
Pennell's gifts."
Councilors Gary Foster and Matthew Sturgis and Manager
Mitchell A. Berkowitz supported Town Attorney Bill
Dale as he pled that case before Assistant Attorney
General Christina Moylan last Thursday, said Foster.
Superintendent Victoria Burns and Facilities Committee
Chair and SAD 15 Board member Peter Pinkerton along
with the District's Attorney listened and asked a
few questions of their own.
Foster said that the main substantive comment that
Moylan offered durn the hour and a half meeting was
to wonder if the intent of the 1954 transfer was to
specifically abandon the trust, or if dropping of
the trust language was inadvertent and the pattern
and practice of the SAD's fifty year commitment to
the trust since that time carries enough weight to
prevail over Gray's pleading.
Moylan said she will take the materials and pleading
under advisement and will render a decision in a month
or two. Meanwhile, the suit against the SAD that Gray
had lodged will continue to be set aside pending judgment.