Statement
on the Second Anniversary of the No Child Left Behind
Act
by U.S. Representative Tom Allen
Washington, D.C.-U.S. Representative Tom Allen made
the following statement on the second anniversary
of the No Child Left Behind Act:
Two years ago, the No Child Left Behind Act (NCLB)
was passed with strong bipartisan support amid great
fanfare and hope. It represented a grand bargain.
States agreed to implement performance standards
to measure annual progress toward learning proficiency
goals in math, reading and other subjects. In return,
the federal government pledged an infusion of financial
assistance.
Today, that bargain is a broken promise. And NCLB
is mired in complexity, discredited by inflexible
and controversial decisions from the federal Department
of Education (ED), woefully underfunded and subject
to widespread disillusionment from parents, educators
and state and local officials nationwide.
Of especial concern to Maine is the ED's insistence
upon forcing its questionable performance testing
and assessment procedures on Maine's schools. Since
the mid-1980s, Maine has worked hard to devise and
implement an enlightened, accurate system for assessing
the progress of students and schools.
Due
in large measure to the success of this effort,
Maine consistently ranks among the highest in math
and reading scores on the well-respected National
Assessment of Educational Progress test. Forbes
magazine recently identified Maine as the state
getting the 'biggest bang for its education bucks.'
Yet the ED has stubbornly maintained that Maine
must conform to its 'one-size-fits-all' assessment
process, forcing the state to lower our standards
or face sanctions and funding cuts.
While imposing dozens of new mandates on our schools,
the Bush Administration has failed to honor fully
its commitment of financial aid. Less than a month
after signing the law, President Bush submitted
a budget that provided $7.2 billion less for NCLB
than the new law promised. This past fall, the House
passed an Education Department appropriations bill,
backed by the Republican leadership and the White
House, which contained $8 billion less than was
promised in NCLB. For Maine, that means $37.5 million
less to spend on teacher training, aid to schools
with heavy concentrations of military or low income
students, technology, and other programs to help
schools reach NCLB targets.
I offered amendments, rejected by the leadership,
to fully fund NCLB, and I have introduced legislation
to require the General Accounting Office to evaluate
annually whether the federal government is meeting
its obligations under NCLB. I will continue to work
to improve the law and to secure funding to relieve
the burden on state and local taxpayers of NCLB's
federal mandates. But, as we mark the second anniversary
of this once-promising law, we have less cause for
celebration, more reason to revisit its provisions
and more grounds to question the commitment of the
Administration and Congressional leaders to live
up to the financial obligations they made to America's
schools.