Public
hearing for some, others, no
By Elizabeth Prata New
Gloucester-The New Gloucester Planning Board reviewed
three applications at their regular meeting Tuesday
night. John Palmiter, professional land surveyor,
was before the Board along with Paul Ellis and Tim
Parks, is developing the Cobble Hill Estates a subdivision,
at McKenney Road.
Their project is in the rural residential and groundwater
protection overlay district. Since the subdivision
is early in the process, the Board advised the applicants
that the Board's site walk will be held Saturday,
February 21, and that the applicants needed to notify
the abutters in advance of the public hearing. Above,
Scott Brady in his Dad's store in Lower VIllage. Although
there had already been a public hearing on this project,
the Planning Board scheduled a second public hearing
to discuss Brady's requested minor amendment for March
2 at 7:30.The Monument: Prata photo
They were also advised to contact the interim fire
chief and provide the rest of the items to complete
their application. Chair Jean Libby did have some
questions as to why the right of ways were designed
at 60 feet wide. Palmiter said that was because of
the development grew in the future the 60 foot right
of way would adhere to road standards. A smaller right
of way would prevent future development.
"Well I think it looks funny," Libby said.
"But then again I have a 60 foot right of way
with a turnaround at my driveway so I guess it's all
right."
In other business, applicant Ken Farrington is asking
to develop Ken's Car Care on the lot adjacent to the
Oliver Stores on Rt. 100. The area is in the residential-business
and groundwater protection overlay districts.
Farrington said that he has been in the towing business
since 1986 and the car care business since 1993. He
used to have the business located on Rt. 26 in the
aquifer protection overlay zone.
The Board had three concerns. They asked how far the
cars for sale would be set back from the road. Libby
was concerned with line of sight obstructions as cars
pulled out from the lot. Farrington said ten feet.
The Board discussed whether to have him set the cars
further back, with Abby Lumsden proposing 15 or 20
feet.
Farrington said that would be fine, except that if
the cars are too far back then the garage would be
obstructed. They settled on asking Farrington to draw
a better sketch map delineating exactly how the cars
would be lined up. Don Mendell said that he didn't
think the Board should be telling him how to run his
business.
The Board also wanted to know if there would be a
fence surrounding the impound area. Farrington said
yes, a wooden fence. Libby asked how many cars would
be contained in the impound area at any given time.
Farrington replied that it was hard to tell from day
to day. "I just had seven cars towed from my
lot today and now none are there. After a snowstorm
there may be quite a few and as they come get them,
then they go. I'd say no more than ten at a time."
Third, the Board was particularly concerned that the
impounded cars would be leaking fluids on the ground,
which is in the groundwater protection overlay district.
Farrington said that at accidents most of the fluids
are dumped on scene. The Public Safety and DEP officials
provide the mechanics with the proper absorbent pads
to bring with them when they tow the vehicles away.
"And when they get to the lot, I put a bucket
under them if they leak." Libby said that sounded
like too low tech of an approach, and worried that
the bucket might tip over.
The Board also asked Farrington where he puts the
collected fluids. He replied that the gives the antifreeze
to one company that is happy to receive it and the
oil to a few other companies that recycle it for their
own purposes.
This seemed to satisfy the board's concerns, and they
waived the site walk, with Libby saying, "We
all know where it is." They also voted 6-0 to
waive any public hearing.
Mike Brady is asking to reconfigure the already approved
uses in his Brady Village Store, located at the intersection
of Gloucester Hill Road and Rt. 231. The lot is in
the Village and Overlay Districts.
Brady had already been approved for a beauty salon,
apartment, and store. He was asking for an additional
use. He is asking that upstairs over the store be
changed from strictly residential to retail/residential.
The Board asked Brady exactly what he meant by retail.
"It makes a difference," Libby said. Brady
said that he didn't have a particular retail use in
mind, but that if the Board approved the use then
it would be overseen by the Code Enforcement officer
to determine appropriate use.
Code Enforcement Officer Debby Parks said that "You
are being asked to approve 4 uses. Whatever he puts
in there will be up to me to enforce. If you approve
them then I can keep an eye on him."
The Board had many questions about the parking for
the store. They had approved 11 spaces two years ago,
under his initial application. Now, they were concerned
with how those spaces were configured and that the
cars parking in them might back out into traffic.
The location of the store is at a four-way intersection
and cars speed down the hill, Libby said.
"You already approved the parking," Brady
said. "All I am asking for is a another use upstairs.
There's already parking spaces designated for those
uses." Planner James Isaacson confirmed that
under the district standards, there would need to
be 9 spaces and the project was approved for 11. "He
has more than enough," Isaacson said.
Ruth Waterman said that she didn't see a problem with
what Brady was asking for if the CEO is overseeing
it. Lumsden agreed, saying that "This is really
a minor amendment to the project. He's fulfilling
the requirements of the ordinance."
Libby said that she would want a redesign on the package
if they were to approve another retail use.
The Board decided 5-1 (Waterman opposed) to schedule
a public hearing on the project for March 2. Brady
will have to notify all the abutters and appear March
2.
When asked why one applicant would have the public
hearing waived and another required to have one, Libby
said that the lot in which Ken's Car Care would go
in has always been a mechanical area "For as
long as anybody can remember." Although the Village
Store has been in existence as a store for 114 years,
Libby then said she didn't care to discuss it any
further.