News
Gray
Council makes prudent use of increase
By Elizabeth Prata
Gray--Gray Town Councilors struggled on Tuesday night
with the Town meeting mandate to reduce their proposed
15% increase down to a 5% increase, and the "rubber
hit the road," as Councilor Matt Sturgis put
it.
Taking nearly $400,000 from the increase was not so
hard at first. The Council held two workshops after
the June 5 Town meeting and closed in on the gap.
They cut a proposed perimeter fence from the Transfer
Station account, reduced proposed reserves from the
sidewalk and technology account, and cut an unfilled
Deputy Code Enforcement Officer position. They also
began tweaking projected revenues, but since the motion
at Town meeting specifically stated that expenditures
must be cut, after seeking a legal opinion, it was
deemed that working with revenues was not adhering
to the specifics of the Town Meeting motion.
That left an approximate $50,000 gap, from which the
Council needed to fill. They proposed cutting the
Assistant Parks and Rec position, the first time a
filled position had been on the chopping block.
Tuesday night the Council needed to make final decisions
because, "The Fiscal Year started five days ago,
and we have business to do," Said Chair Pam Wilkinson.
The Councilors themselves were their biggest obstacle
as they struggled with their own feelings and philosophies
balanced against the will of the voters who spoke
at Town Meeting.
Councilor Richard Barter proposed a Special Town Meeting
to ask for another result. "The Council spent
six months building a budget it believed in and built
in essential services to help the people of this town
and to sustain the culture of Gray. The voters must
have an opportunity to view using surpluses to fund
these programs, while fully honoring the mandate to
cut the budget [increase] by 10%. I do not favor cutting
people, services, or programs just because we hit
a bump in the road."
Sturgis was opposed to that idea. "I cannot support
the concept of another Town Meeting. We have one meeting
a year and to go to another town meeting because we
weren't happy with the results seems to be a complete
disregard of the democratic process under which this
town operates. The mandate was to reduce expenditures,
period. We have finite resources and the rubber has
to meet the road."
Barter countered by saying that "Nothing about
having a special town meeting goes against the will
of the people. It supports the citizens and the process
is supported by the charter."
Chair Pam Wilkinson said that she would be happier
if more people had participated in the budget building
process all along, rather than wait to the end.
Proposing to cut the Assistant Parks and Recreation
position galvanized several citizens who were adamantly
opposed to reductions of that magnitude for the Parks
and Rec Department.
Mark Sanborn told the Council that there were plenty
of places that they could find $100,000, "Easy.
The Employees of this town have the most fabulous
health benefits package on the face of the earth.
They get 100% of everything paid. Also, the Town funds
all employees as if they use that benefit, whether
they do or not. There's money there. The benefits
package is phenomenal, and this is a major cost to
us," Sanborn said. Sanborn also said that eh
thought the idea of another Town Meeting was a great
idea. "This has been a rude awakening and at
another meeting you would get a lot more diverse crowd.
Don't attack programs that are essential to the town."
Parks and Rec Director Dean Bennett said that his
Department was one of the only ones that brings in
revenues to the Town. Removing the Assistant Director
would remove those revenues, since he is directly
responsible for bringing them in.
Bennett also pointed out that The Assistant Director
is responsible for programs that occur on weekends
and nights, and since he has been on the Community
Center grounds during those times, vandalism has decreased,
Bennett said. "This is an investment in your
community," Bennett said. Bennett offered to
cut an additional $6,000 from other areas of his budget
if the Council would allow it. The Assistant Director
receives a salary of $22,527 and no benefits.
In the end, the Council decided to keep half of the
salary in the regular budget and expect the other
half to come from the enterprise budget, paid from
revenues generated from Parks and Rec programs.
The Council and public spoke further as to the town
meeting ramifications. Former Councilor Jack Goosetrey
was forceful in his opinion that the Town Meeting
result was a travesty. "Where in the hell were
people? We have 5,000 people in this town who didn't
come. It's their fault we are having this problem.
The people here in this town just don't' give a damn."
Goosetrey's comment brought forth an angry Thelma
Mitchell, who retorted that she didn't attend Town
meeting, held on a Saturday morning, because she coaches
softball, and "twelve little girls depend on
me to show up. I do care about the town, and I show
my care through my service to the town."
Mike Salvetti also spoke to Goosetrey's comment. "I
realize that it is time that you are gnashing teeth
over these terrible cuts you are forced to make. I
would remind you, that the total budget approved at
Town meeting was a 5% increase over last year's budget.
It is not a reduction," Salvetti stated.
He continued, "Also, Jack said that people don't
care and don't show up. Well, this year was a record
turnout. Far from being a vacuum of public input,
you heard loud and clear what the people wanted and
what they can afford. The cuts
there are emotional
cords, I agree. But please step back and think of
the 1% tax cap hanging over you. This is a weak warm-up
and minimal practice for what you will have to face
next year when it passes."