February 10, 2005 Gray-New Gloucester's Newspaper of Record Vol. 6 No. 6
On-Line
In This Issue:

News

Letters to the Editor

Editorial / Cartoon

Area Art

Caught at the Crossroads

Don't Quote Me On That

Furthermore

Agendas

Photo Album Surveys


Thought

Search our site:

Join our mailing list for new and
updated information!

subscribe
unsubscribe

Site Privacy Statement

Links

 

News

AG says no to reconsideration
By Elizabeth Prata

Gray--The Gray Council and SAD 15 Directors and their Administrators have been struggling with the issues surrounding the disposal of Pennell Institute and Lab, two buildings that are "owned" by an educational Trust established by Henry Pennell in the late 1800s. The Town of Gray first owned the Pennell complex and fulfilled the duty of the trust to use the buildings for educational purposes until the mid 1960s, when the School Administrative District took them over by law when SADs were established.

The SAD 15 budget expenses are apportioned between the towns of Gray and New Gloucester, over and above their municipal budgets.

Now, the SAD has been trying to dispose of the building for two years. The issue is complicated by the fact that there is a statutory disposal process for school-owned buildings, but in this case the Trust conditions must be taken into consideration also. The SAD consulted the Attorney General (AG) for direction as to the proper disposal process, and the answer was that the SAD can sell the building or swap it for fair market value. The AG said that the trust must retain some value or asset or it would not be perpetuated. Gray thought this was unfair and placed a legal stay on the process until their opinion could be heard.

Gray and the SAD went before the AG last fall and presented their positions. On December 17th 2004, the AG sent a letter stating that their original decision would remain, that the building could be disposed of for fair market value and that Gray does not own the building free and clear, despite new research that uncovered a deed that Gray hoped would swing things their way.

The Town Attorney, Council and Manager decided to ask the AG for a reconsideration from that opinion and sent a formal letter asking for a review of the information a second time. Four days later, the AG informed the Town of Gray Attorney, Bill Dale, by telephone that they decline to reconsider the merits of its original position.

Mr. Dale is hopeful about the AG's tentative acknowledgement that the sole beneficiary of the Trust is the "Inhabitants of the Town of Gray," and Mr. Dale is considering "how best to proceed from here." One option mentioned is that the Town may petition the Superior Court for another decision in hopes that their position would prevail.



 



2004 NEPA Better Newspaper Contest; Third place winner, Editorial Writing
2001 NEPA Better Newspaper Contest; Third place winner, General Excellence, Advertising
Selected by the New England Press Association (
http://nepa.org/)
Content and Intellectual Property copyright© 2005 - The Monument Newspaper - all rights reserved



WorldClass Communications
This page last modified on
Friday, 13-Jan-2006 07:33:13 CST