March 17, 2005 Gray-New Gloucester's Newspaper of Record Vol. 6 No. 11
On-Line
In This Issue:

News

Letters to the Editor

Editorial / Cartoon

Area Art

Caught at the Crossroads

Don't Quote Me On That

Furthermore

Agendas

Photo Album Surveys


Thought

Search our site:

Join our mailing list for new and
updated information!

subscribe
unsubscribe

Site Privacy Statement

Links

 


News

Employees to pay health coverage
Council will ask for 10% contribution
By Elizabeth Prata

Gray--The Gray Town Council at its budget workshop on Wednesday, March 9 discussed the last major components of their proposed municipal budget, employee compensation.

Currently, of the 28 municipal employees, 26 take advantage of the various health care plans offered by the town, all of which are 100% paid. The Town Council discussed having the employees who are covered under the family plan to pay for 10% of their health care costs after January 1st. Those employees under the single care plan would still receive 100% coverage. There are currently 4 employees on the single plan.

With Chair Pam Wilkinson absent, Vice-Chair Lynn Olson led the meeting, which included Manager Mitchell A. Berkowitz and the remaining four councilors.

The compensation discussion also included two other components, market raises and cost of living raises. The Employee Compensation Committee, composed of employees and Mr. Berkowitz, had proposed that they receive an across-the-board adjustment for market, because many positions are below what other comparable positions in nearby town receive for pay.

The third component discussed was cost of living adjustment (COLA). The Compensation committee had requested a 3% COLA adjustment. Councilor Matthew Sturgis proposed 2.5%, saying that most towns give 2 or 2.5%. Also, Mr. Sturgis proposed that the market adjustment be reduced to 1% instead of the currently proposed tiered system of a potential total of 2.25%. Mr. Sturgis also said that the raises should be based on merit. Additionally, he said that the town should be adding a percent to the retirement match that the town currently offers employees, from 6% to 7%.

Mr. Berkowitz disagreed, calculating that with the current average salary of $14.55, with with the 2.5% COLA plus 1% market raise, the average hourly wage would be $15.06. However, Mr. Berkowitz calculated, if employees would now need to spend an average of $500 more per year to contribute to health care coverage, the net raise is only 51 cents. "So it's only a 2.2% net gain," Mr. Berkowitz said.

Ms. Olson agreed with Mr. Berkowitz, saying that she thought 3% COLA was fair and that the employees do a good job. She said of Mr. Sturgis's proposal regarding the lowering of market raise and adding a percent to the retirement contribution, "I think it is discriminatory and it probably won't fly." She said she was "willing to move a bit on COLA but if you are throwing in the health care contribution, then no."

Councilors Gary Foster and Richard Hall were silent during the discussions.

Mr. Sturgis said that "I'm not comfortable funding $77,000 [current package recommended by employees]. I know that there are enough people in town who work at far below market salary and they are struggling."

As for the market raises, Mr. Sturgis said that "I am not comfortable giving someone a raise just because they are keeping the seat warm. I do not want to take away from these people, we do get incredible value with some, but I would like to review the scope of work related to their market salary."

The Employee Compensation Committee had produced an analysis of comparable salaries for related positions in a dozen nearby towns. Mr. Sturgis said that that was all well and good, but there is a difference in amount of work expected relative to salaries that each individuals get.

"For example, regarding assessing, when a revaluation comes along, many towns choose to do that in-house, but that Assessor is paid more. A reval is a ten-year event, and Gray chose to contract out for $250,000. But if the Assessor is paid $25,000 more per year and does the reval in-house, it equals out. So you can't say that the job description is only salary-driven if you are looking at two positions that have different scope of services."

Mr. Sturgis further noted that many of the current staff are senior and ready to retire. The Town will have to adjust somewhat to market salaries, he said, when they hire new employees to fill those positions.

The Council agreed to look at scope of services when determining market raises next year. For this year, the Council gave the Manager latitude to determine which positions merit a raise and are going forward with requirng a 10% health care contribution.



 


2004 NEPA Better Newspaper Contest; Third place winner, Editorial Writing
2001 NEPA Better Newspaper Contest; Third place winner, General Excellence, Advertising
Selected by the New England Press Association (
http://nepa.org/)
Content and Intellectual Property copyright© 2005 - The Monument Newspaper - all rights reserved



WorldClass Communications
This page last modified on
Friday, 13-Jan-2006 07:26:05 CST