News
Zone
Change gathering steam
By Elizabeth Prata
Gray--The
Gray Town Council has been reviewing zone changes
town-wide for about two years. They first began by
looking at one segment of town, Rt. 100 south of Gray
Plaza, and then decided that a comprehensive approach
is wiser. They have been painstakingly reviewing changing
zones town wide ever since. Some zones will remain
much the same, except for a name change, others will
change in that they will have additional uses allowed
inside them, or other uses disallowed.
The discussions have been held mostly at Council workshop
meetings, every other Monday at 6 p.m. These meetings
are not televised like the regular meetings are, but
the public is invited and they have been allowed to
comment and ask questions.
There are zone segments left to review. Not all zones
are ready for hearing. The document is still unfinished,
as discussed at the Council's regular meeting on Tuesday,
April 5. Councilor Matthew Sturgis spotted several
long-standing errors that had not yet been fixed,
and raised several other substantive questions in
addition to addressing the inaccuracies.
Councilor Foster also had concerns, as well as the
public, expressed during a lengthy portion of the
agenda dedicated to discussion on the item. The Council
was queried repeatedly as to what the rush was for
passing the zoning draft to the Planning Board for
a public hearing when it was inaccurate and unfinished.
Several citizens posited the notion that the hurry
was because outgoing Chair Pam Wilkinson and outgoing
Vice-Chair Lynn Olson want to leave a legacy. Others
wondered if perhaps they must accomplish the change
before elections on June 14 for fear that the next
Council will not be so eager to approve the new zone
changes. Ms. Wilkinson disagreed with that view, saying
that the draft was 85% complete and it was time to
open up the draft to wider exposure and opportunity
for comment at a different venue, such as the Planning
Board.
After all was said and done, the vote to pass the
draft to the Planning Board was 4-1 with only Mr.
Foster opposed.
The timeline for the upcoming events surrounding this
issue were outlined by Manager Mitchell A. Berkowitz
to the Council in an e-mail, as follows:
"If this Council is to take any action on their
work products, the final (2nd reading with a Council
public hearing has to occur no later than June 7.
To meet that deadline, you must send over to the Planning
Board (PB) the attached order with some of the zones.
This permits the PB to make the proper notifications
hold their hearing either on April 28 or May 12 and
immediately send it back to the Council for a first
read at your May 17 Council meeting. The PH occurs
on June 7. If you miss this April 5 agenda and hold
it off till April 19, we run the risk of running out
of time and unless there is a special council meeting
no later than June 13, you leave the action to a future
Council."
http://www.MonumentNews.com/2005/news/414/414a.shtml