DOT
won't move lot
By Elizabeth Prata
Gray--The Department of Transportation (DOT) Maintenance
lot occupies 5 acres in the middle of Gray Village.
Gray officials have been talking with DOT officials
for over three years to see if the DOT would re-locate
their lot to a less prime area in town.
Recently Rep. Susan Austin (R-Gray) sent a letter
to DOT Commissioner Cole on the same topic. Commissioner
Cole sent a response, both are below. The question
is, that in the spirit of regional cooperation, why
have two transportation maintenance lots occupying
25 total acres of prime space in the middle of town?
The Maine Turnpike lot referred to in the letters
is 20 acres. Above, the DOT lot in Gray Village.
It is between Androscoggin Bank and the Post Office
road on Rt. 100. The Monument: Prata photo
Dear
Commissioner Cole,
It was very good of you to visit our caucus recently,
We really appreciate hearing from the Head of Departments
and having that opportunity to interact on a one
to one with you in a small group setting! I will
reiterate that I am really looking forward to working
with Terry in her new position. She has always treated
me well with her friendly way of communicating information.
As a matter of fact when I saw her in the Halls
last Wednesday I talked with her about this very
note to you.
I write today to touch base with you again on the
"Maine State Camp" in Gray Village. As
we approach this Budget and search for creative
solutions to addressing needs and ways in which
we can economize in our delivery of services, I
pondered the two pieces of property that are so
close in proximity to each other: the State Camp
and the Maine Turnpike Authority Maintenance Facility.
The value and actually need to be open for regionalization
in any fashion reasonable has been one of the hall
makes of Governor Baldacci's administration.
With
that in mind, knowing the administration feels so
strongly in this area I wanted to share again my
serious support of any conversations Gray's leadership
and your office can continue to entertain in combing
locations of road maintenance crews of two departments
into one. Many feel that this consolidation could
work for the greater good in many ways for both
local citizens of Gray and all state tax payers.
I look forward to hearing from you. Left, the
DOT lot's fuel pump and off to the left, unseen,
the sand/salt pile. The Monument: Prata photo
Sincerely, Susan W. Austin
State Representative,
Portions of Gray, North Yarmouth & Pownal
Dear
Representative Austin:
Thank you for your letter of March 1, 2005 regarding
the feasibility of co-locating our Gray maintenance
personnel at the Turnpike's Gray facility. The Department
of Transportation and the Turnpike Authority have
always worked well together. We continuously look
for ways to jointly improve our operations.
This dialogue takes place at several levels. Deputy
Commissioner Greg Nadeau is a member of the Turnpike
Authority Board of Directors; Conrad Welzel of the
Turnpike Authority spends a great deal of time with
the DOT officials and legislators and there are
frequent conversations between Turnpike Authority
staff and DOT's staff in Scarborough. It is through
these conversations that we have exchanged responsibilities
where one could provide a service more effectively
than the other. For example, the Turnpike Authority
plows DOT''s I-95 (Saco Connector) and we plow the
Kittery Information Center roadways.
We discussed your proposal with the Turnpike. We
agree that the Gray facility is located in a convenient
location for both Turnpike Authority and DOT operations.
However, the lot is constrained on three sides by
roadways and by wetland on the fourth. The Turnpike
already feels that space is tight. DOT's Gray facility
has two garages with a total of fourteen truck bays:
a salt storage building and outside materials storage.
There is not sufficient room for us to co-locate
at the Turnpike Authority's Gray Lot.
We understand and appreciate that our Gray facility
does not fit with the Town's long range plans. We
have told the Town that we are willing to relocate
to another lot that is convenient for our needs
however: we would need to be made whole for this
move.
If the Town can provide us with suitable lot and
replace our facilities, we would give them our lot.
It is cost prohibitive for us to undertake such
a move without compensation. We will continue to
work with the Town of Gray to see if a mutually
convenient solution can be found.
Sincerely, David A. Cole
Commissioner,
Maine Department of Transportation