August 25, 2005 Gray-New Gloucester's Newspaper of Record Vol. 6 No. 33
On-Line
In This Issue:

News

Letters to the Editor

Editorial / Cartoon

Area Art

Caught at the Crossroads

Don't Quote Me On That

Furthermore

Agendas

Photo Album

Surveys


Thought

Search our site:

Join our mailing list for new and
updated information!

subscribe
unsubscribe

Site Privacy Statement

Links

 



News

Time to pay for improved school buildings?
Proposes renovations bond this Nov.
By Elizabeth Prata

At the August 17 School Board workshop-meeting, the SAD15 Facilities Upgrade and Renovations Committee (FURC) presented a progress report to the Board, and shared its preliminary recommendations for projects to be included in the bond proposal going before voters this November. Their preliminary recommendations would total $10,727,864.

The Charge

SAD 15 teacher Deb LeDoux and Facilities Committee Chair Peter Pinkerton presented the information to the Board. Mr. Pinkerton said that in February of 2005, the School Board authorized the creation of the Committee and charged it with the task of recommending to the Board projects to be included for application to the state Revolving Renovation Fund. The Committee was also charged with reviewing program improvements for the five schools that would be funded totally at local expense, and to create and implement strategies for successful passage of the November bond vote.

Last week, there were a total of 34 applications that went to the State for consideration for reimbursement under the Revolving Renovation Fund program. Mr. Pinkerton said that preliminary feedback is that the SAD has a good chance of receiving their maximum allotted reimbursements.
Board Chair Dr. Alan Rich said that the State calculates reimbursement based on the total percentage of subsidy that the District receives. In SAD 15's case, the District is awarded 55% reimbursement annually.

Members

Members of the Committee met from mid February to mid August. Those members are Peter Pinkerton, Dr. Alan Rich, Manning Morrill, George Litrocapes, Ron Brann, Andy Upham, Lyndon Keck, Hal Phillips, James Hutchinson, Terry Towle, Victoria Burns, David Sutherland, Paul Penna, Dan Joseph, Deb Ledoux, Craig Moore, Dan Maguire, and Geoff Robbins.

Overview

A brief overview of their work to date includes:
· Reviewed facilities studies including the Sewall Report and the Portland Design Team (PDT) Report.
· Reviewed enrollment projections for next 10 years; no projected increase in enrollment.
· Recommended state Priority 1 and Priority 2 applications for all five schools.
· Discussed and prioritized high school programs to be included in the local bond.
· Discussed and prioritized Dunn space needs.
· Met with fine arts and sports booster community members and high school teachers for feedback for direction of any final recommendations.
· Victoria Burns, Terry Towle, Dan Joseph met with PDT on 8/17 to revise figures based on new PDT numbers.
Proposed bond of about $10 million

As of August 15th, the Committee made preliminary recommendations, proposing a bond total of $10,727,864. Some of this would be offset by state assistance, to a maximum reimbursement award of 2.1 million. "Getting all that is unlikely," said Mr. Pinkerton, "the reimbursement we are estimating is likely is more like 1.5 million."

The recommended projects that qualify for applications for partial subsidy from the state Revolving Renovations Fund for Priority 1 and 2 projects for all 5 schools come to $5,024,314. These are health, safety, and accessibility issues.

According to Board member Alan Rich, the state subsidy for these items would be in the same proportion as the state's other funding to this District. The precise contribution from the state will be calculated in about three weeks. The Committee recommended spending an additional $5,703,550 of purely local money for other projects not covered by the state's Revolving Fund. These would be programming improvements and other facility improvements and not life-safety issues, such as a reconstructed front entryway at the High School.

$5,024,314 Priority 1 and 2 items listed by school:

Memorial School $1,514,443
Priority 1:
· Life safety (kitchen hood, corridor wall ratings, enlarge doors for egress etc for fire concerns)
· ADA issues (bathrooms, ramps, doors)
· Indoor air quality (CO2), ceilings, chimney
· Roof
Priority 2:
· Boiler, water heater, heating pipes
· Electrical system: lighting, intercom, clock system, security system
· Plumbing, leech system
· Exterior walls and windows
· Ceilings, kitchen window and doors

Russell School, $1,180,611

Priority 1:
· Life safety code: kitchen hood, corridor rating, door closers
· ADA compliance
· Roof renovations
· Indoor air quality; ventilation for CO2 levels
Priority 2:
· Ceilings
· Window walls and exterior walls
· Lighting and electrical infrastructure
· Boiler, boiler room, chimney, pipes
Dunn School, $166,149
Priority 1:
· ADA (barrier free ramps, bi-level water coolers)
· Life safety: exterior door awnings, door swings
· Indoor air quality: boiler room chimney, add relief ductwork, music room ventilation
Priority 2:
· Other systems: ceiling tiles

Middle School, $507,718


Priority 1:
· Indoor air quality: mechanical ventilation system for corridors, ceiling tiles
· ADA issues (bathrooms, door swings etc)
· Life safety code: electrical, kitchen hood
· Roof (drainage, snow guards)
Priority 2:
· External closures: masonry, grading
· Foundation systems (entry mat)
· Electrical systems: exterior lighting

High School, $1,655,393


Priority 1:
· Indoor air: ventilation to correct CO2, ceilings, replacement ductwork
· Roof: Performing Arts Building, walkway, water stains etc.
· ADA: door openers, ramps, signage, plumbing, water fountains etc
· Life safety: railings, kitchen hood, gas shutoffs in labs, elevator recall etc., door closers, rated ceilings
Priority 2
· Exterior closure: replacement of glass wall, wall cracking, exterior ceiling
· Interior construction: ceiling locker rooms, west gym floor, east gym superstructure
$5,703,550 in other projects, listed by school

Dunn School, $826,000

The school would get two classrooms to replace the portable and an additional small group meeting space (Title 1, OT etc)

Memorial School, $27,097

This money is the additional funds required to demolish and construct new space, versus renovating the 1948 wing. (The rest of the funding comes from Priority 1 and 2 applications)

Russell School, $530,139

This is the cost to demolish the 1948 wing and renovate and refurbish the current 1960 wing. This proposal will take the place of demolishing both wings and the construction of a 10,000 square foot new addition.

High School, $4,320,314

This amount includes multiple proposed programs for interior renovations and remodeling to accommodate needed improvements.
The Committee identified the following programming needs:
· Science labs (refurbish and add increase space with current footage for one lab)
· Fine arts (drama, chorus, band space)
· Physical education (lockers, weight room, gym floor, gym curtain, added PE station)
· Student services (conference room, third guidance office and record space)
· Food service space (cafeteria)
· Adult education office space
· Special education office space
The Committee recommended the following work:
· Front door and entry lobby
· New administrative suite
· Enclosed hallway from existing cafeteria to art/music shop area
· New physical education station and gym lobby
· Enlarged east gym
· New cafeteria and stage
· Upgrade locker rooms
· Band & chorus
· Nurse station
· Library infill
· Weight room/concession
· Science classroom upgrades
· Additional bleachers for east gym

Recommendations to date

The Committee recommended that all projects be funded. They felt that the renovations should be seen as a package and the High School and Dunn School program improvements should be included in the Bond. PDT is re-examining the projects and will make a more definite cost analysis. As of August 17, it appeared that the total cost might be approximately $700,000 over the cost broadly established at the FURC meeting on August 15. The Superintendent recommended that the revised figures be given to the FURC on August 29 to examine its position and see if some of the projects should be prioritized to reach a lower bonding amount. A final recommendation and presentation will be given to the public and the Board on September 7.



 



2004 NEPA Better Newspaper Contest; Third Place Winner, Editorial Writing
2001 NEPA Better Newspaper Contest; Third place winner, General Excellence, Advertising
Selected by the New England Press Association (
http://nepa.org/)
Content and Intellectual Property copyright© 2005 - The Monument Newspaper - all rights reserved

 



WorldClass Communications