Sept. 22 , 2005 Gray-New Gloucester's Newspaper of Record Vol. 6 No. 37
On-Line
In This Issue:

News

Letters to the Editor

Editorial / Cartoon

Area Art

Caught at the Crossroads

Don't Quote Me On That

Furthermore

Agendas

Photo Album

Surveys


Thought

Search our site:

Join our mailing list for new and
updated information!

subscribe
unsubscribe

Site Privacy Statement

Links

 


News

When a kennel isn't a kennel... or is it?
By Elizabeth Prata

Gray--When the Gray Planning Board voted this month to allow a doggie daycare on Rt. 100 in South Gray, it sparked a strong letter of concern from a neighbor, a letter that was sent to and was read at Tuesday's Council meeting and may have in turn sparked an executive session.

Town Planner Dick Cahill had assisted the Planning Board when they discussed whether to allow a doggie daycare facility in South Gray.

According to Pat Watson's letter, she had several concerns. She wrote that she was not allowed to speak for very long at the meeting during the public hearing portion of the Planning Board's procedure. She had brought along documentary material to support her position, and was prepared to speak during the public hearing, but claimed that the Planner said that she would have to submit it and cut her time to speak very short.

Another concern that Ms. Watson expressed was that the dog daycare facility was put forth as allowable under "animal husbandry," but according to her research animal husbandry is for breeding and livestock management. She said that her research showed that while kennels are allowed in other parts of Town, there are strict standard regarding kennels, such as installing buffers, fencing obtaining licensing, and sufficient acreage. Though the zoning on the relevant part of Rt. 100 does not expressly outline standards for kennels, that such standards are articulated in other parts of the Town zoning, and yet those same standards were not brought into the discussion for this kennel.

Vice-Chair Andy Upham is the liaison to the Planning Board, and apologized for not having attended that particular meeting, due to his prior anniversary celebration plans. He said that he will research the matter and gather the facts. He had read the minutes of the meeting and had read Ms. Watson's letter. "It does seem troubling to me that a citizen could diligently get access to data, both local and state, and which contradicts what the Planner put forth and what the minutes suggest." He said that he will look into this.

Manager Mitchell A. Berkowitz said that it was good that the Vice-Chair will hold off until he gathers more information, and said that though there were several tacks the Council could take to address the concerns in Ms. Watson's letter, ultimately the only real recourse to appeal a Planning Board decision is to go to court.

Vice-Chair Upham suggested that the Council schedule a Council-only executive session to discuss interface with staff. Mr. Berkowitz said that according to the Charter, Council cannot intervene with staff matters, those matters must go through him as Manager, who acts as the liaison to Council for the staff.

Mr. Welch asked Mr. Upham for clarification as to his purpose for the executive session. "You were talking about performance and duties?" Mr. Upham said yes, and at that point Mr. Berkowitz said that "Now you are talking about my performance, and I am allowed to be there." Mr. Upham said that the Council may schedule an executive session to discuss performance without the Manager present, and then asked Mr. Berkowitz for a copy of the performance standards generated by the previous Council so there would be a benchmark to compare against.

"I will provide you with a copy of my employment contract and the Charter," Mr. Berkowitz replied.

"So now you are telling us what you will and you will not give us. That's OK. We can create our own performance standards,." Mr. Upham said.

According to the MRSA Title 1, Chapter 13, Section 405, 6 (A), deliberations may be conducted in executive session if consideration of the employment, appointment, duties, evaluation, resignation, promotion, demotion, dismissal or disciplining compensation of an individual is under discussion. However, the individual is allowed to be present if there are going to be charges made or investigations conducted.

The previous Council had conducted several executive sessions without the Manager present in order to generate criteria and rubrics to use when evaluating the Manager's performance.

The executive session will be held on September 29 at 6 p.m.





 



2004 NEPA Better Newspaper Contest; Third Place Winner, Editorial Writing
2001 NEPA Better Newspaper Contest; Third place winner, General Excellence, Advertising
Selected by the New England Press Association (
http://nepa.org/)
Content and Intellectual Property copyright© 2005 - The Monument Newspaper - all rights reserved

 



WorldClass Communications